| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/18/2005 11:27:17 AM |
NOTE FOR FUTURE:
Don't take a photo in which voters monitors will eithr make it look great or a giant black rectangle. 44 votes of 1, ouch.
Didn't really fit challenge, but I don't live near anything all that compelling. Green Mtns of VT don't really compare to the northern lights of Iceland. Thank you for all the comments. |
|
|
|
11/17/2005 11:14:02 AM |
| Hmmmm... I turned the brightness ALL the way up on my monitor and played with my Gamma settings, and now if I look closely, I can see some hint of the Pleiades and the costellation Taurus. Many people must have much better monitors than me, as I can still barely see anything other than a black rectangle with a few light smudges. One of the hazards of online voting I guess! |
|
|
|
11/16/2005 05:57:09 PM |
| Very intersting. Shows how many people have monitors set too darkly. I think the image is rather fascinating myself. :) |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
11/15/2005 10:57:14 PM |
| There just isn't enough detail in the shot. Try taking a number of shots using the same duration and stacking them together to get a more detailed sky shot. |
|
|
|
11/15/2005 10:33:04 PM |
| how do you get the stars on your camera? |
|
|
|
11/15/2005 04:24:55 PM |
| Should not be included in a Landscape contest. |
|
|
|
11/15/2005 10:52:10 AM |
| Just not very interesting IMO. |
|
|
|
11/14/2005 11:10:37 AM |
| Uhh... looks like a black rectangle. |
|
|
|
11/13/2005 07:48:52 PM |
|
|
|
11/12/2005 01:46:47 PM |
| star pictures can be cool but there needs to be something else on the picture, I can barely see the outlines of the hill over and there arent that many stars on the sky either. If you took this in 3 seconds , 30 seconds would be more like it. |
|
|
|
11/11/2005 10:41:12 PM |
|
|
|
11/11/2005 02:10:10 PM |
| There is some land at the bottom of your photo but the photo is so dark that it is hard to see and sky doesn't say landscape to me. |
|
|
|
11/11/2005 01:03:14 PM |
| I have wanted to do this shot, however yours is not very appealing. I think if there was something to reference the sky too like a partually lighted house or something. The lower section of the image is very dark. If there was something there perhaps it would be better. IMO |
|
|
|
11/10/2005 11:39:26 PM |
| I like this shot other than the small white section on the bottom right corner. A slightly tigher crop would have made this photo falwless in execution. 9 |
|
|
|
11/10/2005 08:24:00 PM |
| The stars in this photo came out pretty well! However, it's hard to see any detail in the land portion of the pic. Perhaps a sillhouette of a tree mingled with the stars would be nice for the Landscape theme. |
|
|
|
11/10/2005 04:35:31 PM |
| not much land in this lanscape. |
|
|
|
11/10/2005 04:35:24 PM |
| Beautiful! I love photos that clearly show twinkling stars, crisp and sharp. Great job. |
|
|
|
11/10/2005 02:49:41 PM |
| Risky, and I like it. Nice tonal separation between t he ground and the sky. |
|
|
|
11/10/2005 05:26:35 AM |
| Nice picture of Hydra, but don't see the landscape. |
|
|
|
11/10/2005 12:31:14 AM |
| not enough stars to be interesting. |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 05:06:57 PM |
| Of course the sky is a part of the landscape, I do not see that the sky IS the landscape :-( |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 01:10:29 PM |
| have been waiting for this to come back since march:) |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 12:15:33 PM |
|
|
|
11/09/2005 12:00:50 PM |
Removed unhelpful comment.
Message edited by author 2005-11-18 03:41:42. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 05/04/2024 04:03:32 PM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
