From past to present
by BruB

Comment by dahkota:
if your depth of field was a little deeper this would have been an amazingly striking image. Like the juxtaposition.

From past to present
by BruB

Comment by dcano:
Too hot, not sharp.

Lingerie
by BruB

Comment by batmaing:
I think there's too much light above the navel. I think the DOF could be a bit more shallower. Also, using a real model would've made the picture much more provocative.

Lingerie
by BruB

Comment by melismatica:
It took me a second to find evidence of shallow DOF in this. I actually like this composition quite a bit. I like the panties used as a design element with the unorthodox amount of empty space above (I'm find of this type of composition although I prefer a narrower, more vertical frame when utilizing it). Sadly, I don't really think shallow DOF does anything to enhance this composition. It actually detracts from the what could be a crisp and clean graphic statement. For this composition to work really well the focus needs to be very crisp and the pink needs to really be separate from the white. I would enjoy seeing this done again with a vertical frame and very sharp focus, no shadows,and a perfectly spotless white background so that it appears as one graphic statement.

Lingerie
by BruB

Comment by carpents:
Mannequin?

Lingerie
by BruB

Comment by fotodude:
seems as if a verry strong USM was applied to this...i think it does not read as having a strong focal point and should be reshot to be made more clear

Working Sky
by BruB

Comment by Prism:
I like the composition but find the focus a little too soft to make this a truly stunning photo.

Working Sky
by BruB

Comment by thepester:
Not bad. But busy? Sky isn't that spectacular. Could do with more contrast.

Working Sky
by BruB

Comment by ggbudge:
It's nice to see construction as opposed to destruction. Your photo fits the challenge well. Good Luck!

Working Sky
by BruB

Comment by jduffett:
I like this. This is my kind of shot, though there's something a little off about the composition. I can't quite put my finger on it, but perhaps a slightly different angle or crop would be more effective (hard to say without being there of course).