Image |
Comment |
| 08/27/2002 12:29:00 PM |
Footsby seby20Comment by grahamgorman: Great composition, texture, balance, contrast. Excellent. Nitpick : it would be even more perfect if the toes in the foreground were in focus. But, top ten anyway. |
| 08/27/2002 11:32:00 AM |
Footsby seby20Comment by ClubJuggle: This is an excellent photograph, but I think fails to meet the spirit, if not the letter, of not including a child in the photograph. |
| 08/27/2002 11:28:00 AM |
|
| 08/27/2002 10:43:00 AM |
Footsby seby20Comment by magnetic9999: EXCELLENT photo. i thnk you werent supposed to have a child in the pic though.. since we were all thusly limited, so should you be. sorry. |
| 08/27/2002 07:32:00 AM |
Footsby seby20Comment by vestanpance: Surely that small foot belongs to a child?! Nice photo though, good coloring and definition. |
| 08/27/2002 05:39:00 AM |
Footsby seby20Comment by razwan: Well, I am not sure if a child's foot is within the rules but I guess I don't care too much! I like the sepia tone of this photo and it brings out the sun and sand well (in my view). Well done. |
| 08/27/2002 01:54:00 AM |
Footsby seby20Comment by byetko: This is a really neat photo but I have to take points off for a child in the photo. Good job though otherwise. 5. |
| 08/26/2002 10:00:00 PM |
Footsby seby20Comment by just-married: Although I really like this photo, it's a stretch of the challenge for me. I know you're probably fed up with hearing that, but there it is again. Sorry. I like the sepia decision. I really like the sandiness on the feet. I like the bright spot on the top of the adult foot and I like the texture in the towel. The child's foot doesn't even really bother me, although I think technically, it shouldn't be there in a tight challenge interpretation. What bothers me is that I don't see childhood in the photo. Still, I'll think on it, and may come back. 6 for now. just-married |
| 08/26/2002 09:37:00 PM |
Footsby seby20Comment by Willa: Excuse me, but that IS a CHILD'S foot in the photo. There are not supposed to be children in the photo. |
| 08/26/2002 09:22:00 PM |
Footsby seby20Comment by alanfreed: I would have to argue that the picture does indeed include a child... maybe not a whole child... but a child... |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/14/2025 08:56:58 AM EDT.