Foots
by seby20

Comment by grahamgorman:
Great composition, texture, balance, contrast. Excellent. Nitpick : it would be even more perfect if the toes in the foreground were in focus. But, top ten anyway.

Foots
by seby20

Comment by ClubJuggle:
This is an excellent photograph, but I think fails to meet the spirit, if not the letter, of not including a child in the photograph.

Foots
by seby20

Comment by paganini:
I thought no child in the photo is allowed?

Foots
by seby20

Comment by magnetic9999:
EXCELLENT photo. i thnk you werent supposed to have a child in the pic though.. since we were all thusly limited, so should you be. sorry.

Foots
by seby20

Comment by vestanpance:
Surely that small foot belongs to a child?! Nice photo though, good coloring and definition.

Foots
by seby20

Comment by razwan:
Well, I am not sure if a child's foot is within the rules but I guess I don't care too much! I like the sepia tone of this photo and it brings out the sun and sand well (in my view). Well done.

Foots
by seby20

Comment by byetko:
This is a really neat photo but I have to take points off for a child in the photo. Good job though otherwise. 5.

Foots
by seby20

Comment by just-married:
Although I really like this photo, it's a stretch of the challenge for me. I know you're probably fed up with hearing that, but there it is again. Sorry. I like the sepia decision. I really like the sandiness on the feet. I like the bright spot on the top of the adult foot and I like the texture in the towel. The child's foot doesn't even really bother me, although I think technically, it shouldn't be there in a tight challenge interpretation. What bothers me is that I don't see childhood in the photo. Still, I'll think on it, and may come back. 6 for now. just-married

Foots
by seby20

Comment by Willa:
Excuse me, but that IS a CHILD'S foot in the photo. There are not supposed to be children in the photo.

Foots
by seby20

Comment by alanfreed:
I would have to argue that the picture does indeed include a child... maybe not a whole child... but a child...