Image |
Comment |
| 01/16/2006 09:41:26 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/16/2006 09:41:06 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/16/2006 09:39:23 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/16/2006 09:38:15 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/16/2006 09:37:41 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/16/2006 09:36:51 PM |
Pigeon Chaserby redmoonComment: Might have had more impact if it was rotated vertically .. nice shot though |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/04/2006 09:31:13 PM |
Wada Basin Fractalby seebrownComment: just a note on that site I posted earlier .... all of those "shots" are computer generated. I would have loved to take a shot with such clarity but without very perfect and very large spheres I think those would be imposible. Here are a couple of sites where fractals were shot with a physical camera ..
Wada Basin Fractals (Photo's) Magazine cover
Note that the sphere's used in the above site are about 3 feet in diameter.
This site shows you exactly what I did to get the shots (I think my shot is better than his though!)
Wada basin fractal photo setup
For that matter I think my shot is better than the shot in Scientific American 2002
Thanks for taking interest in fractals ... |
| 01/04/2006 07:19:28 PM |
Wada Fractal Patternby seebrownComment: Originally posted by DrAchoo: Hmm, some of the other pattern pics I commented that the pattern was not prominent enough. Here, I'm afraid the pattern may be too prominent. There isn't much left for us to grasp, such as context. My first split-second impression wasn't too interested, but when I read your description, I was intrigued. It's too bad that you couldn't have zoomed back so we became aware that this was, in fact, four christmas tree ornaments, but still have the pattern emphasized. My first guess was a kaleidoscope which seems sorta boring.
The composition is very centered, which is good for pattern, but not good for dynamics. The colors are soothing and not oversaturated. In the end, I guess we are left a little dazzled and confused and move on because we don't know what we're really looking at. |
Thanks a bunch for the criteque ... much appreciated. I really feel you hit the nail on the head with the comment "I guess we are left a little dazzled and confused and move on because we don't know what we're really looking at". Makes sense considering how many 5's were received |
| 01/04/2006 07:15:16 PM |
Wada Basin Fractalby seebrownComment: Originally posted by macrothing: This one is a little better (clarity wise) in my opinion, but you can still see the lens. Looks like a difficult technique/method to nail. edit:typo |
Unfortunately the only way to shoot this requires the lens to be in the shot ... |
| 01/04/2006 07:10:34 PM |
Wada Fractal Patternby seebrownComment: Give a little more background here. The shot is actually in perfect focus ... though macrothing is right about it appearing out of focus, due to the the fact that the christmas tree ornaments that I used were not perfect sphere's. Anyhow, I'm starting to realize that because 99% of voters had no idea what it was probably did not help with the scoring. Message edited by author 2006-01-04 19:20:08. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/03/2025 06:19:38 PM EDT.