| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/07/2015 08:35:26 PM |
subtle editing on the left eye/cheek would have still been legal. i think.
interesting take on the rules.
|
|
|
|
01/04/2015 11:03:27 PM |
Originally posted by Mike:
Originally posted by damjanev:
Even with the description and the original shot this looks alike a legit edit in "Advanced". |
since when are we allowed to remove image area in advanced editing? maybe the shadow would be considered legal since it was shadow, but i've seen dq's for burning down an area so it was obscured even if it was edge of the image.
i figured removing visible features would be a no-no. |
From the rules:
You May:
- clone out incidental power lines, twigs, dust specks, stray hairs, and similar minor imperfections within any capture used.
I am pretty sure that covers the wire that was in the original. |
|
|
|
01/03/2015 08:03:45 AM |
| Congrats Mike. Great to see you owning the front page |
|
|
|
01/02/2015 12:24:59 PM |
| Congrats on the Red. I'm thinking the cloning out of the wire would've been the main point for a DQ. Without dodging/burning, playing around with the contrast levels and some selective color would create a very similar low key effect and make the wire even less visible, if then cloned out wouldn't have been a major element anymore? |
|
|
|
01/02/2015 12:06:24 PM |
Originally posted by damjanev:
Even with the description and the original shot this looks alike a legit edit in "Advanced". |
since when are we allowed to remove image area in advanced editing? maybe the shadow would be considered legal since it was shadow, but i've seen dq's for burning down an area so it was obscured even if it was edge of the image.
i figured removing visible features would be a no-no.
Message edited by author 2015-01-02 14:30:40. |
|
|
|
01/02/2015 09:32:24 AM |
Originally posted by damjanev:
Even with the description and the original shot this looks alike a legit edit in "Advanced". |
That's what I thought as well. |
|
|
|
01/02/2015 09:24:46 AM |
| Congrats on the ribbon. This was one of my high scores and it's beautiful. |
|
|
|
01/02/2015 08:35:01 AM |
Even with the description and the original shot this looks alike a legit edit in "Advanced".
|
|
|
|
01/02/2015 08:08:40 AM |
| Congratulations. Her mien is so much in keeping with the image's demure charm. |
|
|
|
01/02/2015 01:28:25 AM |
| Congrats on the great finish - an awesome shot! |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
01/01/2015 10:37:29 PM |
| Gorgeous.. the light is perfect! Maybe the b/g is a little TOO perfect? Or maybe the eyelashes were touched up. Gosh, what detail. Voted earlier. |
|
|
|
01/01/2015 10:05:24 PM |
|
|
|
01/01/2015 07:50:31 PM |
| Nice and sharp, and well lit. Not sure on the broken rule, maybe a major object cloned out? |
|
|
|
01/01/2015 02:55:10 PM |
|
|
|
01/01/2015 02:06:59 PM |
| Most excellent negative space and minimal detail |
|
|
|
12/31/2014 09:11:45 PM |
| She was originally a clone and you uncloned her. So by not cloning something, you didn't break a rule and this entry does not meet the challenge topic. |
|
|
|
12/30/2014 02:21:11 PM |
|
|
|
12/27/2014 10:47:21 PM |
Wonderfull photograph
I'm guessing.....Deadline date |
|
|
|
12/26/2014 10:21:41 PM |
| Beautiful low key. If you broke a rule, I can't tell what it is. |
|
|
|
12/26/2014 08:45:03 AM |
| Best in show award, congrats |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/14/2025 01:19:38 PM EDT.
Low Key
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
