Author | Thread |
|
06/22/2005 12:42:29 AM |
A good lesson, could not remmember the steps I used to create the image. |
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
06/21/2005 04:26:31 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/20/2005 11:16:37 PM |
Freaky photo! I really like it. The one thing that detracts, for me, is the green effect on the brush. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/18/2005 02:16:09 AM |
I really like this image. I'm guessing you inverted it. I think it would be a little more appealling if the green in fron weren't so shocking. Maybe you could desaturate the green or crop just above the plants. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/17/2005 05:12:38 PM |
overly post processed. THat poor grass! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/17/2005 03:28:59 PM |
i can't make my mind up about this picture. On one level I really like it, especially as it is different and with an abstract challenge like darkness i feel that is a time to experiment, but the subject does not really feel dark to me, and that is not because of any religious conviction either way. There is obviously some association for you, I think you should be applauded though, it is an image i will remember from all the rest. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/16/2005 08:46:21 PM |
hmm, not sure I like the negative effect to immulate darkness... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/16/2005 07:55:09 PM |
though i'm not usually a big fan of negative images, this caught my eye, though it seems to have a little too much contrast in it. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/16/2005 07:43:09 PM |
The processing looks cool on the building but the bushes are too bright. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/16/2005 07:09:53 PM |
I love the church and the composition, but what is going on with the grass in front? Did a hue/saturation adjustment go wrong? Still a decent score because of the beauty of the chapel, but it lost a couple of points for me because of the greens. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/16/2005 06:10:35 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/16/2005 04:19:32 PM |
I don't care for the effect....looks too unnatural for me. Although, the subject matter looks very interesting |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/16/2005 03:39:52 PM |
I'm sure this one is controversial. It's a cool building and the processing is interesting. I hope the voters rember the definition of the challeng instead of letting their personal beliefs get in the way of their objectivity. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/16/2005 04:53:23 AM |
Is this the one at Wanaka ? 9 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/16/2005 12:44:12 AM |
interesting - not sure if the effects / inverting? of the image fit the rules- not sure about reaching on topic - but a nice image |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/15/2005 11:47:51 AM |
This image looks inverted (?). It's cool, but it seems like the picture was taken during the day, and was inverted to fit the challenge. Low marks for lack of effort.
|
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/15/2005 07:56:23 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/15/2005 05:49:49 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/03/2025 07:58:02 PM EDT.