| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/02/2003 08:00:24 PM |
*Critique Club*
This is a little off the wall, yes, but I would say it definately fits the challenge.
I do think that the lighting is a little low on the fossil. Maybe some kind of either side lighting, or lighting from the top would helps the little ferns to stand out a bit.
The focus seems a little soft as well. Maybe it's just the texture of the rock, but the little ferns don't seem to be very crisp.
The comment that this is a copycat pic is a bit rediculous. What shot ISN'T a copy cat pic? You have put an object in front of words, and that's pretty common, but I see nothing wrong with that.
The angle and framing/cropping I think works for this shot. You were able to get both the definition and the rock in the shot, and show adequate amounts of both.
This doesn't grab my attention and hold it, but it isn't bad either. I think that the rock was probably difficult to get both lighting and focus because of the texture and bumpiness. Still a good interpretation however.
~Heather~ |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
05/27/2003 01:37:31 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/27/2003 10:53:23 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/25/2003 10:00:14 PM |
| Believe kiwiness did something like this not too long ago. The image isn't interesting, the fossil subject is mainly out of focus and the idea is that of a copycat. 2 |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/23/2003 06:05:57 AM |
| :-) Rather desperate attempt to put across your relevance. Like it. The photo - not enough definition on the fossils (lighting?), and the untidy positioning of the text is a pity. Made me smile though. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/23/2003 05:33:23 AM |
|
|
|
05/23/2003 04:47:19 AM |
| Me thinks the challenge was about the film. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/22/2003 09:58:26 AM |
| Fossils... right-on, since I missed the movie. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/21/2003 08:42:14 PM |
| Well, I'll give you that!! The picture DOES fit the challenge!! :) Good job! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/21/2003 03:21:03 PM |
| Nice idea to put the definition in the pic. Guess your not a big Matrix fan. Good pic though..a bit underlighted |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/21/2003 01:37:38 PM |
| Hum, neat idea but I think the fossil in the front is not very attractive in this shot. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/21/2003 11:15:43 AM |
| I don't mind you having different and wider interpretation. But I found that you push it too hard to make it acceptable. If you wanna do it, do it without a highlightened definition of a photocopied dictionary. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/21/2003 10:20:52 AM |
| TOO SUBTLE! kidding :) nice interpretation of the challenge. The highlights should eliminate any question about suitability...shouldn't it? |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/21/2003 12:29:00 AM |
| Accurate interpretation of one of the definitions of matrix. I don't really care for the lighting on the fossil. It looks a little washed out, colorless, and flat. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/13/2025 11:57:50 AM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
