| Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
02/14/2006 09:04:17 PM |
|
|
|
02/14/2006 05:45:28 AM |
| interesting, yes. panning? hard to say... this probably would have done very well in abstract. |
|
|
|
02/12/2006 09:06:07 PM |
| a bit hard to figure out the subject in this photo :( |
|
|
|
02/12/2006 06:21:16 PM |
| Definitely shows motion, but there is no separation per se from the background and the subject. It is just blurry. |
|
|
|
02/12/2006 02:42:20 AM |
|
|
|
02/11/2006 04:42:27 AM |
| There is no background so it is hard to gauge the speed of the jump and as the subject is so out of the focus, this looks more like an abstract that a motion panning technique |
|
|
|
02/11/2006 12:16:48 AM |
| sorry, to abstract for me. |
|
|
|
02/10/2006 04:06:51 AM |
| It's alright but I feel the picture lacks any real center point of focus, I'm sure this is the way you wanted it but to me it doesn't really work out that great. |
|
|
|
02/09/2006 04:56:44 PM |
|
|
|
02/09/2006 12:02:52 PM |
| Once again please look at the picture you have taken. The white background is nice, but the person is completely out of focus, theres no real panning only motion. It just doesn't look clear. Im not a photography expert but I know that most of the time pictures look best not blurry. |
|
|
|
02/08/2006 11:10:13 PM |
|
|
|
02/08/2006 09:07:33 PM |
| what? I see a blurry subject not motion panning |
|
|
|
02/08/2006 04:15:04 PM |
| good picture, it seems total abstract |
|
|
|
02/08/2006 02:53:07 PM |
| Interesting effect and idea. But it doesn't demonstrate motion panning, as it doesn't contain the elements of sharp tracked subject and motion-blurred background. |
|
|
|
02/08/2006 02:30:20 PM |
Sorry, but everything is blurry. Part of the challenge description says:
"bring out foreground from background"
You did not do that. |
|
|
|
02/08/2006 02:09:22 PM |
| A little bit faster shutter speed might have helped improve the sharpness enought to more easily tell this is a person. |
|
|
|
02/08/2006 12:47:41 PM |
|
|
|
02/08/2006 07:35:41 AM |
|
|
|
02/08/2006 06:08:35 AM |
| I would probably have said this was a "motion blur" shot, rather than a "motion panning" shot. Also, I would probably have entitled it "Fall" rather than "Jump" as they seem to be travelling down and this is where the space is. While it is a stylish image, it is hard to tell whether it was a panning shot went wrong as the subject is not sharp, or it was supposed to be a motion blur shot - which is not really what was asked for. |
|
|
|
02/08/2006 12:50:02 AM |
| there's no background for me to detect motion panning. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 08:04:03 AM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
