Author | Thread |
|
05/15/2006 09:40:09 AM |
huh? is in reference to the title, not the photograph. the title lacks any sentence structure (even for a title). i thought maybe there was something to it that the author might be able to elaborate upon. i see that is not the case.
even now as i type i cannot understand what dark past close means. i gave it a 2 because the title is simply 3 words only one of which describes the existing photograph. the other 2 words do not seem to connect in any way to the photograph. none of the 3 words seem to connect in any format, not even in broken english (or another language for that matter).
sorry you felt disrespected, that was not the intention. i was merely perplexed so i replied with. huh?
i now revamp my huh? to what does this mean? and i still score it a 2 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/15/2006 06:48:56 AM |
As for the rest ,thank you very much for the comments they have been helpfull for me :) |
|
|
05/15/2006 06:45:00 AM |
Ok comments as such are not apriciated at all all suspect from any one ! If you have to say anything about my photo do so ,dont give me (huh) and all this nonsence ,as a photographer yourself ,i think you will have more apriciacion about somebody elses work and comment as other people do normaly ! I am getting quite fedd up with comments as such and please next time ,save your comments for somebody else !!!!
Originally posted by tngrndream: huh? |
|
|
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
05/14/2006 10:24:37 PM |
..like the use of grain here..adds a nice "grit" to the image. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/14/2006 08:39:06 PM |
I like the photo and the dirty grainy processing. The title is a bit odd though. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/12/2006 10:31:24 PM |
|
|
05/12/2006 03:41:49 PM |
Could be a David Lynch film |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/11/2006 11:27:45 PM |
Over processed and grainy..... |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/10/2006 11:32:55 PM |
The noise really hurts this shot. I'm also stuck trying to figure out what the subject is. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/10/2006 03:35:24 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/10/2006 10:28:05 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/09/2006 03:42:52 PM |
scary photo and creepily enigmatic title. I like it. Great diagonals leading into the dark center. The grain gives it a horrorific feel. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/09/2006 06:23:34 AM |
At first I felt that it was a pity you used noise for this one, but I took a second look and I changed my mind. It fits well with the mood in this photo. Nice colors. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/09/2006 03:22:33 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/08/2006 07:16:11 PM |
I like the picture but the movie title throws me a little. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/08/2006 04:31:08 AM |
Did you go for the noise effect? I like the lighting but the sky doesn't work for me |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/08/2006 01:30:49 AM |
It seems as if you are trying to make a noisy and poorly exposed night shot into something. Even the title is obscure. Sorry, I'll bet you can do better. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/08/2006 01:30:46 AM |
Kind of has that Blair Witch feel to it. I like it. Grainy and scary. Great title - believable as a movie. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/08/2006 12:59:22 AM |
Way to be gutsy and use image grain. I wish you could have come up with a better title though...6 for now |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 08:03:13 PM EDT.