Author | Thread |
|
06/25/2006 06:38:33 AM |
[[trading post]]
there are a few flaws that makes this a bad architecture picture,
composition is bad, the image splits to close to the center, the building in the background covers more than 50% of the frame and is therefore the main subject, even though I think the building on the right should be the main subject.
you show to small part of the building for it to be recognised, it's ok to show a small part, but that part must have something really special for it to work, and something unique so you can recognise the building from that small part.
lighting is good, no harsh shadows on the red building.
there are a lot of lines, vertical, horizontal and diagonal, wich makes this image so much better than if the walls were smooth.
I think your score is fair for an image like this. |
|
|
06/06/2006 09:54:21 AM |
Trading post...
Nice use of colors. The lines are very crisp and uncluttered. This photo would stand on it's own without the challenge which I think makes a photo great. You could see this on an office wall. Great job. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/05/2006 11:05:26 PM |
Trading Post comment
Composition/subject I rather like this composition - I like the use of the two strong leading lines, and the pattern in light orange above the darker orange. The complementary colors play off each other nicely, too.
Technical The lighting works well for this image - no harsh shadows which gives more strength to the architecture itself. A possible suggestion would be to see if you can darken the blue building a bit to either get rid of or tone down the stuff you can see inside the windows.
Meets challenge Yep, meets challenge! Some may not have seen it as very exciting architecture, but as I said, I like the way the two buildings play off each other.
My opinion Might not have appealed to the masses, but I like it! |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
06/05/2006 05:24:33 AM |
Composition
Very nice shapes/angles, maybe would have suited a slightly tighter crop on the righthand side, so the transition wasnt right in the middle. Whilst I love all the lines and shapes and colours, the angle does make the righthand side a little busy (aat 640*480ish at least) just because there is so much detail.
Technical stuff (exposure, dof, lighting etcâ€Â¦)
Exposure and lighting seem good, I like the brightness of the reds against the duller blue glass.
Post-processing
n/a, all is fine and dandy imo
Message/atmosphere portrayed
very nice study of shapes and colours, with the juxtaposition of different styles of architecture
Meeting the challenge
Nice take on architecture - a real study of details rather than "a picture of an impressive building" (for example)
My personal opinion
This was underrated by far - I didn't vote on this challenge, but would probably have voted 7/8 |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
06/04/2006 02:55:01 PM |
not sure which one im to look at, but both are kinda boring to me. Not much there for attention grabing. |
|
|
06/03/2006 11:48:39 AM |
|
|
06/02/2006 12:53:17 AM |
Using a new formula....
0-2 Meets the Challenge = 2
0-2 Technical Merit = 1
0-4 Interest/Creativity = 2
0-2 The "wow factor" = 0
Final score: 5
Too divided in half - better to have one or the other predominate. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/31/2006 10:48:47 AM |
Nice contrast of color and style. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
05/30/2006 07:23:48 PM |
IMO, this image has left out the architecture,and used colors insted....5 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/19/2025 01:19:21 AM EDT.