DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Challenge Entries
Portfolio Images
This image is not part of a public portfolio.
Ok, Who Took My Shoes?
Ok, Who Took My Shoes?
OneSweetSin


Photograph Information Photographer's Comments
Challenge: Portrait (Advanced Editing I)
Camera: Minolta DiMAGE 7i
Location: Penn State Altoona
Date: Mar 14, 2004
Aperture: f 5.6
ISO: 100
Shutter: 1/350
Galleries: Humorous, Portraiture
Date Uploaded: Mar 14, 2004

N/A

Statistics
Place: 95 out of 135
Avg (all users): 5.0474
Avg (commenters): 5.8750
Avg (participants): 4.9167
Avg (non-participants): 5.1565
Views since voting: 1108
Votes: 211
Comments: 18
Favorites: 0


Please log in or register to add your comments!

AuthorThread
 Comments Made During the Challenge
03/21/2004 02:15:50 AM
Oh, yes! I like it!
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/19/2004 03:41:50 PM
Cute expression. It looks less posed than I tend to think of a potrait being and the the detail of the grass pulls attention away from the subject.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/18/2004 03:58:17 PM
nice and simple and effective
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/18/2004 01:35:11 PM
very cute! the lighting seems a bit hot on his feet and a bit shadowed on his face, though. nice composition and pose.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/17/2004 10:01:16 PM
A darling shot... cute!!
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/16/2004 04:45:01 PM
I hope he has worn shoes at some point since his "Huck Finn" days...!
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/16/2004 03:42:02 PM
A very well composed and playful shot. You really captured the essence of this little boy's personality, something every portrait should do. Good luck!
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/16/2004 11:11:23 AM
I find this photo to be a candid rather than a portrait. For a portrait, the shadows cast over the eyes don't work for me. And the light cast on his check and feet overexpose the photo. Last, the background doesn't add to the photo, but rather it detracts. Hope this helps.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/16/2004 12:50:51 AM
Portrait does not mean it has to be close up, but I would have liked to see this one with more towards the face and the cute smile. May have helped with the DOF also (going fuzzy) to bring all attention to the child.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/15/2004 08:50:53 PM
Defiinitely different! BOL
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/15/2004 06:48:24 PM
Cute shot. Definitely meaningful to anyone that knows the subject and a good capture regardless. While you can't slow kids down for photos (don't I know that) I'll simply point out that the subject's left foot is a little hot and while his right foot seems to have a suggestion of motion because it appears blurry. This is a solid capture and I'm sure any relative would love to have it in an album or stuck to the refrigerator but from a technical standpoint a reflector or a little fill flash would do wonders by just brightening up the shadows on the subject's face. After the fact, though, you can still make some decent changes in Photoshop if you have it by creating a duplicate layer, using the polygon tool (2nd down on the right column) and selecting the darker areas around the eyes and blending down onto the bridge of the nose. Next feather the selection by 5-10 pixels (Select | Feather) and then in the Layers menu create a new Curves Adjustment Layer (its the little circle button at the bottom with a diagonal line through it, when you click it a new menu appears and you select "Curves". Now you can click in either the upper right or lower left corner (based on how your Curves is setup) and then use the arrow keys to move up and down until you actually lighten the shadows to blend them into the subject's brighter cheeks. This won't completely remove the shadows and you don't want to overdo it but I think its a useful tip to know and I think it would help this shot a little.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/15/2004 01:32:20 PM
great, fun portrait. I thiunk I would have cropped out the empty grassy area on the left.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/15/2004 11:50:09 AM
Kinda cute, but given that the title and the eyes are naturally drawn toward the feet, it's a shame they aren't in better focus. You could have cropped off the left hand side of the picture without loss. The subject's face is a bit too shadowy, as well. Nonetheless, if this were MY kid, I'd have this picture framed somewhere!
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/15/2004 11:22:06 AM
I think it can be improve if you more DOF. The face is a bit sft too. But I lke the colors and the candidness of this shot.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/15/2004 10:31:11 AM
The only thing that is keeping this down is the busy background. Maybe a tighter crop next time.
03/15/2004 09:41:40 AM
The location doesn't really inspire, mainly with the brown dirt on the left . Something closer in and vertical and just using some of the rocks behind for background might be stronger. The pose looks good though the hands 'scratching' the foot looks awkward. A reasonable attempt that could benefit from a less barren location.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/15/2004 04:29:12 AM
Like the use of the background to complement the main subject - nicely balanced composition.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
03/15/2004 02:27:32 AM
Cute photo, but too candid for me.
  Photographer found comment helpful.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 04:37:33 PM EDT.