Author | Thread |
|
05/05/2008 06:22:44 PM |
Greetings from the critique club!
This has been mentioned before but I'll reiterate anyways. I think the only problem with this shot is the lack of separation between the drops forming the three and the background. Perhaps larger drops might have helped. One thing I did pick up on which I appreciate is that you printed the background backwards so that the words would be mirrored in the drops and therefore display correctly. I also agree that a shallower DOF would have helped. (I wonder how it would have turned out at f/2.8?) |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
04/29/2008 09:03:26 PM |
fun take on the classic water drop image. Good stuff :-) well done. -9- |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/29/2008 10:33:51 AM |
Shallower DOF would be nice, blurring the print behind. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/28/2008 01:10:13 PM |
I really wish the background was more blurred and the Odd's were a lot larger. |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/25/2008 08:21:28 AM |
nice use of droplets to create the focus lenses for the shot - the only issue i see is that the 3 itself is not separated enough from the oof background |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/24/2008 11:19:10 AM |
Cute -- A little contrived, but very powerful. It took me a while to figure out what "PPO" stood for (Doh!). Did you try a lower case "O", then "PPo" may have been more apparent as the inverse "odd"? |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
04/23/2008 12:16:13 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/10/2025 10:09:54 PM EDT.