Don
by dsa157

Comment:
9

too much detail on the skin. Especially the nose and mouth. Unsharp mask in separate channels could give you a sharper image without enchancing grain and skin defects.

solitude
by rider

Comment:
i'd give it a bit more room on both sides. 8

Architecture is music in space
by tinky2

Comment:
interesting detail. A column that doesnt really do it's job :) a 7 because it's architecture and I would prefer the perspective illusion to be repaired. (parrarell lines converge).

Heritage
by amber

Comment:
looks like some spot post processing was done. How ever the image is interesting and very oriental to me. It;s a 7

soft song from the past
by Seanachai

Comment:
I get the feeling this image doesn't use the whole spectrum of possible "colours". Too litlle contrast. B & W photography is difficult to get it right :) it's a 7

1779 - The Worlds First Iron Bridge
by Ian-Andrew

Comment:
Tad overexposed. I would sacrefice the details under the bridge to get better saturation in the greenish parts.7

Palace of Fine Arts
by floydrowe

Comment:
don't like the colour. Though love the fine detail. I say a 9

Things are not always as they seem...
by jasm8

Comment:
Very tempting eyes. Though remember if you show a face of a human or an animal.... the eyes can never be out of focus! We are predators and that's where eventually we'll look. It's a bad thing especially on a shot like this to have eyes out of focus. This doesn't work for this picture. It's not helping.

I like the idea and I assume that next time you will keep the eyes in sharp focus. So I give you a 9 :)

Anybody Home?
by bryanbrazil

Comment:
I really do like the tilt and the object and... it's perfect. I do give you a 10

MEEOOW!!
by pearlseyes

Comment:
Now that's what I call camouflage and a sexy body :) Take no offence :)