Image |
Comment |
| 11/12/2003 08:18:59 PM |
Sun-Tzu, "The Art of War"by ZalComment: I could be horrible here and suggest, to paraphrase Sun Tzu, that if you are not strong then you should not go on the offensive ;) I'd like to see more sharpness in this one, as the idea is good. I'm not sure if that high key background works, as it has the effect of softening all the edges. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/12/2003 08:15:14 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/12/2003 08:14:19 PM |
Catch 22 by Joseph Hellerby trainComment: It's a bit too static to fully represent the concept of 'catch', which is what you were looking for. If you're going to play on that word you need to make this more dynamic. In the strictest sense, it's not a literal interpretation of the book title, but I guess there's nothing wrong with that (a literal interpretation would have been more interesting however). |
| 11/12/2003 08:12:11 PM |
The Name Of The Rose by Umberto Ecoby ShannonComment: Nice composition, though on my monitor it;'s a bit dark and I can't see as much detail as I'd like to. In fact, it's so dark that I didn't immediately identify it as a rose. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/12/2003 08:10:41 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/12/2003 08:10:04 PM |
The Lamplighterby lbWhaplesComment: You really need to include a lamplighter to make this one work. That lamp looks like it hasn't been lit for centuries. Composition is good, and it you're going for a historical feel the choice of toning is also good. I would suggest straightening the verticals and a little bit of unsharp mask to bring out more detail. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/12/2003 08:08:00 PM |
"Bell, Book and Candle"by SMW409Comment: If it weren't for the good use of lighting this one would have been pretty dull. You managed, however, to get good shadows and highlights. Looking closer, it may have been more challenging to try to conjure up something to fit the title of the book you used here... |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/12/2003 08:06:19 PM |
Prospecting for goldby Pop_in_OzComment: Nice colors. Unfortunately tbough, the foreground (i.e. the thing which relates the subject to your chosen book title) is a bit too dark so the whole thing loses impact and relevance. It's possible, however, that shadow detail could be recovered using contrast masking - or you could have used a graduated neutral density filter when taking the shot to darken the sky and reveal more detail in the foreground. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/12/2003 08:04:20 PM |
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer´s Stoneby cimarron98Comment: Are the white oval reflections part of the image, or just reflections? This one is a bit flat - it may have worked better if you'd set it up in such a way as to create more of an impression of depth. I'm not sure that B&W suits this one, because there isn't a great tonal range. Given that it's a recent book color would have probably been more appropriate anyway. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/12/2003 08:01:36 PM |
Trading Upby bobgaitherComment: The link between the photo and the title is pretty tenuous - and you don't do a really good job of making that link. Trading up to this? Trading up from this? The light here is really flat, and this makes the subject look two-dimensional. The textures are potentially interesting, but you would have needed to take the shot later in the day when the sun was lower to make more of them. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 02:39:33 PM EDT.