Image |
Comment |
| 12/10/2002 02:31:38 PM |
The turnby KanedaComment: Was this a rainy night? Nice shot, but the glare spots detract. |
| 12/10/2002 02:30:41 PM |
Fanby blickComment: Is the fan on? I can't really see the motion - pic just looks blurry. |
| 12/10/2002 02:29:41 PM |
Freedomby Brenna KimiComment: Pic is too small. I see the motion, and you have the stationary reference point, but the size makes it hard to see. |
| 12/10/2002 02:28:31 PM |
Adrenalinby oriontrailComment: It's been said before - in order for motion to really show, there needs to be a stationary point of reference. This would be a great shot for the 'Drunk' challenge, but here it's kind of dizzying. |
| 12/10/2002 02:27:21 PM |
|
| 12/10/2002 02:26:42 PM |
Time In Motionby kposeyComment: This would be better as a long exposure/slow shutter - maybe with the pendulum going all the way if your camera can do it. |
| 12/10/2002 02:25:27 PM |
|
| 12/10/2002 02:24:45 PM |
Going Down?by DavenitComment: Nice long exposure - the dart is going straight down, so all the motion looks right. |
| 12/10/2002 02:24:03 PM |
Waves of my heartby monrfComment: I figure you probably desaturated, but it seems a bit washed out to me. The motion here is in the mind, since it's not really visible to me. |
| 12/09/2002 08:31:57 AM |
Gridlock'dby arnitComment: Wierd, how she's transparent. Nice motion capture. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/16/2025 11:44:38 AM EDT.