DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register) 
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Individual Photograph Discussion >> HOW DID HE DO THIS????
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 25 of 30, (reverse)
AuthorThread
 03/12/2006 04:34:25 AM · #1
Can anyone PLEASE give me ideas on how I can do this.


03/12/2006 04:58:32 AM · #2
And this is not photoshopped? In PS it would be reasonable easy to get this result. But without... no idea.
 03/12/2006 05:10:00 AM · #3
Originally posted by Dimy:
And this is not photoshopped? In PS it would be reasonable easy to get this result. But without... no idea.

Galleries: Digital Art

Photoshopped most likely.
 03/12/2006 05:13:17 AM · #4
3 photos on 3 layers with progressively reduced layer opacity.
 03/12/2006 05:19:51 AM · #5
Lots of possibilities with photoshop.
I did this one by using a giant cloning tool. Just stamped it twice, then cleaned up a little bit.
03/12/2006 06:23:33 AM · #6
Originally posted by kiwiness:
3 photos on 3 layers with progressively reduced layer opacity.

Exactly ... with the original frames coming from Burst-Mode in the camera. I would imagine that the other two (transparent layers) would have to clear-cut (Mask) out the water so that the only water you see is the main layer.

Brett
 03/12/2006 07:07:06 AM · #7
Not hard once you know how to do it.

Though I may have done it a bit differently, results are the same.

Message edited by author 2006-03-12 07:35:29.
 03/12/2006 04:11:20 PM · #8
There is a way of doing this without photoshop - you need a camera capable of long or multiple exposures though...

I did it using a darkened room and fired a flash 6 times during the exposure - I fired it twice with the subject in it's starting position (to give a stonger impression) and then moved the object between flashes. This sort of effect can also be achieved by covering and uncovering the lens or with a camera that allows multiple exposures.

03/12/2006 04:38:33 PM · #9
Originally posted by Leok:
There is a way of doing this without photoshop - you need a camera capable of long or multiple exposures though...



Yeah, but the pix in question is on the beach, and in broad daylight.

Anyone available to give a tut on the PS technique?
 03/12/2006 04:42:01 PM · #10
It can still be done in camera, it's just easier in PS.
 03/12/2006 04:53:25 PM · #11
If it were in a darker location (ie not the beach) would be easy with multiple flash bursts.
03/12/2006 05:03:39 PM · #12
there is this tutorial on how to do multiple images in PS, in this pic they just changed the opacity as well //dpchallenge.com/tutorial.php?TUTORIAL_ID=36

hope this helps
-dan
edit for link linky

Message edited by author 2006-03-12 17:04:25.
 03/12/2006 05:05:15 PM · #13
ND Filters with flash ???

03/12/2006 05:10:38 PM · #14
You can do this kind of thing in camera by baffeling off part of the scene and moving the baffles as the subject moves across the area, but given the different densities of information from the head to feet in the leftmost image, this had to be done in photoshop. The shadows say that this was done by sunlight alone, or possibly at night with a REALLY big flash. Nuclear explosion type flash

Message edited by author 2006-03-12 17:13:15.
 03/12/2006 05:10:45 PM · #15
Originally posted by nomad469:
ND Filters with flash ???


I kinda doubt that it is. Because the sand in the foregorund would be terribly over exposed.
 03/12/2006 06:38:27 PM · #16
Naw, you're all wrong. It's just a really fast kid. :)
 03/12/2006 06:51:36 PM · #17
I can't stop looking at the crooked horizon. lol Looks like PS to me, but very cute and great way to showcase those first toddling steps.
03/12/2006 07:01:01 PM · #18
Check out the work done by graphicfunk. Daniel really is the master of multiple exposures in the camera.......he gives descriptions of how he achieved the final result on most of his images.
03/12/2006 07:03:04 PM · #19
Looks like a very grainy shot done at a high ISO setting. This could have been closer to nighfall vs strong daylight. Then this would be possible with ND filters and flash. Hmm.
03/12/2006 07:07:00 PM · #20
Originally posted by Kavorka:
Looks like a very grainy shot done at a high ISO setting. This could have been closer to nighfall vs strong daylight. Then this would be possible with ND filters and flash. Hmm.


I guarantee this was mid-day. Shadows show the light source to be close to directly overhead, and exposure was short (wave motion is stopped). The grain is very uniform, and I suspect was added in post. Though it is in fact possible to do this in-camera, everything tells me it was done in post.
 03/12/2006 07:08:18 PM · #21
Originally posted by Kavorka:
Looks like a very grainy shot done at a high ISO setting. This could have been closer to nighfall vs strong daylight. Then this would be possible with ND filters and flash. Hmm.


The shadow is almost under the kid, its close to midday.
03/12/2006 07:09:38 PM · #22
Originally posted by idnic:
Originally posted by Kavorka:
Looks like a very grainy shot done at a high ISO setting. This could have been closer to nighfall vs strong daylight. Then this would be possible with ND filters and flash. Hmm.


The shadow is almost under the kid, its close to midday.


Good point. Missed that one. Duh! I wonder why so grainy?
03/12/2006 07:12:35 PM · #23
Yeah, I don't know why so much grain....Camera phone? lol
 03/12/2006 07:14:04 PM · #24
look at the water. if it was a long exposure, you wouldn't see a frozen wave break. 100% photoshop. but it's still a very cute home project.
 03/12/2006 07:24:28 PM · #25
I pm'd the artist to see if we could be enlightened on the exact technique.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 10:00:00 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/12/2025 10:00:00 AM EDT.