| Author | Thread |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
11/07/2004 11:16:40 PM |
| Even though I might agree with you, I think this is not in good taste, and not a particularly interesting composition or even a technically good photo. Sorry, next time try harder. |
|
|
|
11/05/2004 09:08:02 PM |
| Without the title, I guess I don't find this to be a very interesting photo. Garbage has never been something I was real fascinated with, and definately wouldn't hang this on my wall. Focus seems a bit soft, but lighting is ok. Background works, nothing distracting there. Just not my cup of tea. ~Heather~ |
|
|
|
11/05/2004 05:17:43 PM |
| ...this should have gone under rant in forums imho. Nothing there. |
|
|
|
11/05/2004 02:44:25 PM |
| Oh well....at least it all came right in the end for you!! |
|
|
|
11/05/2004 02:07:50 PM |
| This doesn't appear to be any kind of composition to me, and not in very clear focus. Interesting concept and could probably being carried out with more empasis on lighting and composition. It is also sized too far below the allowable diminisions. |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
11/04/2004 03:54:24 PM |
| The election showed them. Needed a larger image here |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
11/04/2004 03:42:41 PM |
| I see... now seriously is this interesting to you? why? |
|
|
|
11/04/2004 12:37:25 PM |
| the image needs to be a bit larger. you should submit it at the full 640 px |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
11/04/2004 10:52:54 AM |
| Not sure why you think the NY Times is so liberal (and why liberal = trash), but I won't let that affect my rating. The picture is too small (use the 640 limit - it's a small limit as it is!), and the composition is dull. Otherwise an interesting idea. There appears to be areas with lack of focus suggesting shallow DOF, but maybe that was a disguised hint at the shallow POV expressed ;-). |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
11/04/2004 09:47:06 AM |
| i think i wouldve liked the picture more if there wouldve been a background full of trash and amidst all the garbage there we saw the "liberal media", it just looks too staged. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
11/03/2004 10:25:03 PM |
|
|
|
11/03/2004 12:23:37 PM |
| politicallly speaking I'm with you - smal size makes it seem blurry, or at least lacking resolution for good detail or texture |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
11/03/2004 05:47:50 AM |
I think you have a great idea, the problem with this photo only is that it will score low here on DPC.
There's just too much rubbish in this photo to be apreciated by the masses.
If you shoot for yourself or for your own "fan-base" it's ok. But here at DPC, if you would like to "score" there are some things that you must and must not do.
No: artsy pictures, pets, dificult to understand photo's, deeper meaning.
Yes: Oversaturated, burned sky's, landscapes with sunset oversaturated with burned sky's)
I know i know, but it's realy true... |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
11/02/2004 06:23:36 AM |
you get one for being an idiot and 0 because you voted for Bush!
|
|
|
|
11/02/2004 12:19:01 AM |
|
|
|
11/01/2004 11:18:23 PM |
| Is this the best you could do? |
|
|
|
11/01/2004 09:10:08 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
11/01/2004 07:48:43 AM |
| You were not the one that posted the 'Kerry in the toilet' photo? :) |
|
|
|
11/01/2004 12:56:27 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/02/2025 09:11:27 PM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
