House in the wood
by Travis99

Comment:
Love the picture and the post processing

Old path into the darkness
by Prime_Time

Comment:
no no no no no. That's not the way to make an image interesting :). Well you over did it.

Old Number #14
by coolhar

Comment:
Now that's a happy image :) SO clean and sunny. 8

Austere Splendor of the Dark Ages: Cathedrale of Bayeux (1077 b.c.)
by elee3009

Comment:
Too bad that day the sky was the way it was... But the expore on the building... well its extremely moody. Like it. A 9. But only if you promiss to go back and do the shot with a different sky :P

The way things used to be made
by armin

Comment:
Personally for this image I would allow you to use selective tools to desat the flame. I like it. 9

Stonehenge c 2000BC
by obsidian

Comment:
B & W photography it's not just discarding colours. Its also keeping the colour dependencies in the gray scale. This is even more difficult to make it right than colour. Because we see in colour and B&W well requieres a lot of thought. It's not a good technical b&w but the exposure seems right -ish and the object is nice so it's an 8

Forgotten
by GIS_boy

Comment:
don't know if that's post processing or it's shot like that but it doesn't matter. The image is really good. If not for that grass touching the lens. a 9

"Arsenic and Old Lace"
by naomik

Comment:
don;t know what you meassured but I think we can both agree the expore is not right. 7

Earth Mover
by holdingtime

Comment:
such an interesting object and you didn't give it appropriate space. Well it's hard to make out anything. The picture looses it's force. Its 7

Hippie Chick
by emmylou

Comment:
I have nothing against vivid saturated colours... but done with good taste :) This is unreal and negativly unreal. I give it a 7