Untitled
by aznym

Comment:
Making the simple complex, and reducing the complex to simplicity. You're still Az. It's a positive image. I mean the energy it depicts is all positive. Thank you.

A1010215 1
by MAK

Comment:
Very impressive photograph. I've never tried but I imagine it must be quite difficult to get the exposure right (which you clearly have) in a scene like this? I went to a school, and to a military college, with similar though not-quite-so-grand settings. Imposing austerity is a British tradition. It instils a sense of...something or other... that's probably both important and irrelevant. Anyway, a nice photograph that you don't at first notice is square. Thank you.

misty 1
by tnun

Comment:
May I be the first to say Play Misty for Me? Groan, that was awful, sorry. I admire the way that Misty can express such anticipation in every fibre, even seen from the back. That's a helluva range, method-acting-wise. This picture says so many nice things about the photographer. What you care about. Thank you.

et sic incipit
by Bear_Music

Comment:
What does? Does this mean those are new crocs? They look real incipit, man. And that's your knee, is it? Lots of bold geometry, lovely tones, hint of latin, a flash of implied leg. It's only an elephant short of orgasmic, for me. Thank you. Mind if I smoke?

Closing Time
by GinaRothfels

Comment:
He paints flowers on the floor with his mop. He's dreaming, and winning the dream. Tones and grain: you're dreaming too. Thank you.

moi
by Ecce_Signum

Comment:
I thought it was Stephen King in the thumbnail. It probably still is. This Ecce thing was always a bit suspect, Steve. Love your stories, by the way. Hearts in Atlantis is my favourite.

I also love fooling about with pinhole cameras. This is mine, shoots on 120 film.

According to the guy who made it for me, it's f177.

I like your picture, especially for the studied negligence that necessarily attends pinhole, and for the tones that don't but are very nice. Thank you.

the future
by mariuca

Comment:
It took me an embarrassingly long time to unravel this. It's all shot through glass, right? With a reflection on part of the glass? I'm pretty sure it's that simple, but the effect is of a visionary all right. It made me think of 1984, though I'm not sure why. Maybe it's because he looks like Winston Smith. Anyway, you made a convincing effect, the analogue way. Bravo! And thank you.

9193-web_dpc_sq
by SaraR

Comment:
I like wildlife pictures. I had no idea they could be done in colour though. This is nice! I'd try some colour myself after seeing this but I'm probably too old to change now. Kidding aside, this is a very nice wildlife portrait, and I am pleased to see some 'environment' included in the scene. Look how much context and emotion that inclusion brings! Versus a super-tight crop, I mean. Thank you.

- - - -
by krnodil

Comment:
It looks like ink. Or an etching. Yes, an etching! It's a good example of what monochrome can see/show, that colour can't. Thank you.

. . . still warm
by glad2badad

Comment:
This is my favourite (other than my own magnificently confused creation, but of the remaining less breathtaking entries, yours is the best).
What I admire about your entry is that it's not a one-dimensional photograph. That̢۪s still so rare as to be remarkable.
So 10 for you.
Thank you.